Evaluation Activity 3 - What have you learned from your audience feedback?
For the production of this music video, we targeted males of an adolescent age and above with an interest in independent, rock music but with the look of a more mainstream band, this was to get a larger audience as the traditional look of a rock band would discourage people with interest in more mainstream bands thus the band's appearance is a combination of the two. We chose this audience because after first listening to the song, we realised that the disconnection of the song is common amongst many teenagers and is something many young people must face, thus we could achieve an even greater audience.
To get an idea of what this audience would expect from the video, we simply asked people our age to listen to the song and give us some of the words that came to mind as they visualize the song in their minds. We then created the Wordle shown below from this information.
It is clear in the final music video that we incorporated some of the features from the Wordle;
- The performance aspect of the video was the first thing that we filmed, we immediately performed the song multiple times from various angles so we could go back to it in-between narrative scenes to allow the narrative to flow better. The high request for performance was a result of the strong use of instruments in the song, the catchy tune was apparently more memorable than the lyrics and thus we showed this a lot in the video, even having the band members pretend to play closely in tune to the song.
- We combined the funny, carefree and youthful parts of the song and put them in middle of the song, showing the character "pranking" classmates when he was still very young, shown by the uniform before changing to the older more tolerable version of him.
- Though we understand the request of a retro mise-en-scene, we could not add this because it would contradict the approachable, mainstream look we were going for that could appeal to more people, and even though both were equally suggested, we went for the school setting to better target our audience.
- The theme of love and relationships was touched upon early in the video with the character's brother and showing how close they were, then showing him going after the girl he likes later in the video, constantly pursuing her with the words, "let's stay together."
Trying to satisfy the audience using these words was difficult as some are so contradicting due to the many possible themes of the song, our first attempt was darker and more
obscure than funny and ironic as we had someone of a different race play the brother and had fewer cuts, resulting in a slower pace and filtering it to reduce the brightness and lighting. We also had more scenes of the character brooding and walking to emphasize his loneliness, however, looking back at our original Wordle made us realise we were straying away from a band that could appeal to people with interest in more mainstream bands and more to the conventions of rock music with the additions suggested above, thus we removed certain scenes and maintained colour to produce the final version.
Audience Interviews
Another way we were able to get audience feedback prior to filming was through interviews which we filmed, both interviewees are 18, Joshua Esselen and Jeremy Tang. Though the Wordle was much more general and vague about audience expectations, personal interviews are more accurate as they can say exactly what they expect, and as a video that is supposed to appeal to multiple audiences of young people, we did not defy these expectations much so we could satisfy this audience.
The interviews show that they both had very similar expectations for the video. Both expected the band members to look casually dressed, they also wanted a fast pace and quick cuts between narrative and performance, both expected humour. The first interview specifically requested we have young people throughout the song, to not only relate to the target audience but to also keep the idea of youth and recklessness.
We did not at all defy these expectations and they are clearly present in the video, all scenes that would normally have adults shows adults either unaware or removed from the shot.
The majority of the scenes in the video are filmed to be funny, even the scenes that are supposed to create sympathy for the character are either ironic or turned into jokes, this was our way of maintaining the mood requested in the interviews without ruining the slight impact of these situations. The verse about the older brother is written so that we feel sorry for the character's brother, who's life is in danger as he has "joined the army and they said he might get shot." Instead, we showed him playing violent shooters with his brother, a controversial issue for soldiers in order to make the situation ironic.


The appearance of the band was also taken from these interviews, the "casual" look requested perfectly fit our target audience. The main band member would wear dark clothing when he was younger, all conventions of the rock music genre. Even when he is older and in the performance aspect of the song, a band-mate wears a dark brown shirt and black trousers while the other has the iconic long dark hair. also conventional of the rock music genre. The lead singer, however, wears a red checkered shirt and jeans, which clashes with the conventional clothing of rock music and our way of making the band more casual and seem approachable. As a result, the band's look overall makes them look like members of both a rock band and a normal mainstream band. This is how significant these interviews were to our final music video to satisfy our target audience.
Survey Monkey
To further understand the target audience, we used "SurveyMonkey" and "Scribd" to put together the following graphs from audience feedback we'd collected after allowing people to hear the song without any idea of the video.
The graph shows that the most popular location suggested for the music video was a rooftop or any other urban environment, one of the few audience suggestions that we did not follow in our final video. The use of a school made much more sense for the story of the song as a school is a more appropriate environment for handling social issues than an isolated urban environment.
A more appropriate way to have incorporated the requested environment is if it had been in the performance, separated from the narrative and would make sense as a place the character goes after struggling at school. An abandoned field does not represent rock music as well as an urban environment and if we were to ever repeat this to correct mistakes, we would use a different location for the performance but keep the narrative at the school. This way we could have maintained the natural flow of the narrative with a more interesting performance beside it, however, finding an isolated urban area would have been difficult.
Feedback after Final Music Video
Once we had finished the video, we had our classmates, also producing their own music video, give us feedback and criticism on the video in a free-form discussion. Having them review the video was better criticism than having a general audience criticize us because they have been through similar issues and appreciate our successes better but can spot mistakes better than the general audience, resulting in more accurate criticism.
From their reactions in the video, the music video was overall
successful but there were some issues they pointed out. The parts in which we
were successful were;
- Editing the scenes together
with fast cuts to allow the narrative to flow.
- The lighting and
cinematography is placed to make the video crisp, clear and easy to
understand.
- The character in the video
is easy to understand and it's clear hi's funny.
- The performance parts of the
video are in tune with the song
- The attempts to make it funny suited the song.
- The development and arc of
the main character is not clear in the music video
- There is no clear conclusion
for the relationship between the character and the girl.
- There were not enough
variation of shots, simply medium to long shots.
- The short verse about the
hoodlums attacking his parents' house was rushed.
However, some parts of the video were not successful;
- The development and arc of
the main character is not clear in the music video
- There is no clear conclusion
for the relationship between the character and the girl.
- There were not enough
variation of shot types and angles, simply medium to long shots.
- The short verse about the
hoodlums attacking his parents' house was rushed
Conclusion
The reason we did not have more interesting cinematography was because of the pace of the song, having different non-traditional angles in-between such short scenes would make it difficult for the audience to understand some of the scenes. We should have found a way to use more interesting cinematography to really emphasize the character's isolation, recklessness and humor without sacrificing how clear the story is.
We also should have made it clear how the story ended, as a traditional narrative driven music video, Todorov's equilibrium theory should have been clear, there is an equilibrium then a disruption (the character's brother leaves to join the army and he attempts to pursue the girl he likes) but there is no resolution to this, though it is mildly implied she has no interest in him it is not enough. As a result, the character's arc is not complete, which was mentioned in the discussion and if we had another chance, we would simply add a scene where she kindly puts him down and he accepts it, then a transition to the more mature, tolerable version of him in the performance. this would have concluded the story nicely and better connect the performance to the narrative.